This will be the thin end of the wedge we said at the time, once higher education is no longer free then there will be no way back. So it has proven.

I paid fees in my first year (I wasn’t even aware there was a don’t pay movement as a wide eyed fresher) and resisted paying as long as I could in my second year, by which time the thrust of the argument had been lost. Strangely the 1999 website I made for fees protests, complete with my college e-mail address, is still online.

This is my favorite photo from the protests in Oxford at that time – taken in autumn 1999 as far as I’m aware, scanned from the original photo so I have no precise date. It sums up the energy and the anger very much in evidence yesterday too.

What, I wonder, did we achieve then?

The NUS – dominated by Labour Students – backed fees at that time, and critique of Aaron Porter at the moment strikes me as rather familiar. We managed to get some national press coverage for the cause – I remember a front page spread in the Daily Telegraph and a bunch of protests that nagged at the university authorities. Among my other protest pictures from the time I can identify many people who are still close friends, and others who have achieved political power. But what did we change?

I wonder whether we should have got really angry back then. Done the equivalent of smashing up Millbank? I don’t know. Would I have personally dared to be in the middle of it? Where would I have been in the equivalent of Laurie Penny’s report? Or was this just the anarchist edge that has dominated student protests over the years, a point underlined by Luke Akehurst today (who was probably himself selling out on fees as a Labour student in the 1990s)?

So I view all of this with some sort of melancholy solidarity. We’ve lost, and the coalition is hammering the last nails into the coffin, a death that Labour started in the 1990s. Back a decade ago we had naively hoped we could have stopped it. Not so.

Man scratching head - CC / Flickr

The upgrade of the West Coast Main Line cost between £8 and £10 billion and trains have a maximum speed of 200km/h, and it’s a fiendishly complex mixed traffic railway. France’s LGV Est cost €4 billion and the service speed is 320km/h. Why did the UK not go for a High Speed Line instead? Belgium knows the Jonction Nord-Sud will be at capacity by 2020 and is making plans now for what to do about the problem, while east-west journeys in London have been a nightmare for at least a decade building still has not properly started for Crossrail, due to open in 2017 – if the horribly complex finances hold. Or the PPP system for the London Underground…

But it’s not just transport. What do you do about anti-social behaviour? Getting to grips with the heart of the problem – inequality – would be too tough, so ASBOs are thought up. An unenlightened population wants to see bobbies on the beat (even though they don’t actually stop much crime), so the government dreams up Police Community Support Officers that look like Police but are cheaper, rather than having a proper discourse about crime and society. On environment the UK government is waking up to the need to take some practical steps – a pay as you save scheme – while Danish and German firms have at least a decade head start on proper development of renewables technologies and have leading firms in the renewables sector. The UK has a witty word for opposition to windfarms – NIMBY – but still has far too few windfarms.

It even applies to government – where else would anyone dream up a messy fudge where the parliaments in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland all have different powers devolved in different ways, and live with an anomaly like the West Lothian Question? That’s even before dealing with unitary authorities, London and directly elected mayors.

Yet the one thing that does function are the UK’s unversities – with between 2 and 4 of the world’s top universities in the UK (depends how you calculate), and no other European universities in sight.

So in short the UK should have plenty of fine minds to help it solve any sort of problem but, at a governmental level at least, lots of the problems – from ASBOs to the West Coast Main Line – are issues that other countries just don’t have. Why?