<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jon Worth &#187; Hans-Gert Pöttering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonworth.eu/tag/hans-gert-pottering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonworth.eu</link>
	<description>At the intersection of the EU, UK politics and tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:49:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why is the choice of EP President more interesting than choice of Commission President?</title>
		<link>http://www.jonworth.eu/why-is-the-choice-of-ep-president-more-interesting-than-choice-of-commission-president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jonworth.eu/why-is-the-choice-of-ep-president-more-interesting-than-choice-of-commission-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EUPolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Parliament President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graham Watson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hans-Gert Pöttering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerzy Buzek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mario Mauro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Schulz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonworth.eu/?p=2217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My discontent about the lack of choice about the future President of the European Commission is well known. But it seems &#8211; bizarrely &#8211; that the choice of the President of the European Parliament might actually become a bit more &#8230; <a href="http://www.jonworth.eu/why-is-the-choice-of-ep-president-more-interesting-than-choice-of-commission-president/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2218" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 209px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/barbar/2325144452/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2218" title="Statue at the EP - CC / Flickr" src="http://www.jonworth.eu/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/ep-statue-199x300.jpg" alt="Statue at the EP - CC / Flickr" width="199" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Statue at the EP - CC / Flickr</p></div>
<p>My <a href="http://www.anyonebutbarroso.eu/">discontent</a> about the lack of choice about the future President of the European Commission is well known. But it seems &#8211; bizarrely &#8211; that the choice of the President of the European Parliament might actually become a bit more interesting. President of the EP is a largely symbolic role, chairing the sessions and with some external representation tasks. Perhaps the election intrigue is a manifestation of the old Henry Kissinger quote that &#8220;<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">university</span> European Parliament politics are so vicious because the stakes are so small&#8221;?</p>
<p>Anyway, so what&#8217;s going on? Essentially the President of the EP is usually a tie-up between the 2 main political groups in the Parliament, the <a href="http://www.epp-ed.eu/home/en/default.asp">EPP-ED</a> and <a href="http://www.socialistgroup.eu/gpes/">PSE</a>. Each gets the Parliament President for about two and a half years of the five year parliamentary term. Josep Borrell, a socialist, preceeded Hans-Gert Pöttering, a christian democrat, in the current term.<br />
<span id="more-2217"></span><br />
For the 2009-2014 term the socialists want to put forward tub-thumper Martin Schulz, but as a German national he cannot follow Pöttering. So the EPP-ED will get the first call &#8211; if tradition is respected. Former Polish PM Jerzy Buzek was the most likely candidate, although now Silvio Berlusconi &#8211; with the additional backing of Alleanza Nationale in the EPP, want their own man &#8211; Mario Mauro. See <a href="http://www.euractiv.com/en/eu-elections/face-italians-poles-parliament-presidency/article-180656?Ref=RSS">this from Euractiv</a> that explains the games.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s the overall issue of how the President should be selected and whether &#8211; shock horror(!) &#8211; the person to do the job should actually be a <em>good</em> candidate! Leader of the ALDE Group, Graham Watson, has <a href="http://www.watsonforpresident.eu/">put his hat in the ring</a>, saying he will run to be President of the Parliament, and won&#8217;t tolerate the old carve up. I&#8217;ve met Watson a few times, and while I don&#8217;t agree with his policies all the time, I think he&#8217;s a sharp and interesting guy. He&#8217;s also received some <a href="http://www.watsonforpresident.eu/2009/03/socialist-mep-backs-watson-bid-for-eu-parliaments-top-job/">backing from Borrell, and Polish MEP and chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee Jacek Saryusz-Wolski</a> (who is from the same party as Buzek).</p>
<p>So let&#8217;s see what happens&#8230; The process will end up being opaque and tied up in the metaphorical smoke filled rooms, but at least there is a bit of discussion and a few candidates &#8211; more than can be said about the Commission at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jonworth.eu/why-is-the-choice-of-ep-president-more-interesting-than-choice-of-commission-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

