Miliband explains all the problems of the European left – now time for solutions

David Miliband set out his concerns about the predicament of the European left in a speech at LSE this evening. The full text of his speech is available at Labourlist here, and Next Left has a little post from earlier here.

As you would expect from the elder Miliband, the speech is full of references to thinkers in Labour’s past and a compassionate understanding of some of Europe’s main centre left parties. The headline fact is that at no time since World War I has the left not been in power in the UK, Germany, France, Netherlands, Italy and Sweden, and Miliband sums up the predicament this way:

Left parties are losing elections more comprehensively than ever before. They are losing from government and from opposition; they are losing in majoritarian systems and PR systems; just for good measure they are losing whatever position the party had on the Iraq war; and they are fragmenting at just the time the right is uniting.

It’s from this point on that it’s possible to examine Miliband’s words, and also try to propose some first hints of ways forward.

Continue reading

Email This Post Print This Post

A new Germany-EU discourse

Ulrike Guérot

Ulrike Guérot

I heard a short speech in Berlin yesterday evening by Ulrike Guérot from the European Council on Foreign Relations at an event organised by Europa Union. The essential gist of her presentation was that, now, 20 years on since the fall of the Berlin Wall (and indeed that’s half as long as the Bundesrepublik existed during the cold war), Germany is on a fast track to escaping from its traditional role as the country that pays for everyone else in the EU. Fair enough, Merkel’s behaviour during the Greece crisis seemed to show that very well, and Germany’s strong growth in the second half of 2010 shows that the economic motor is still doing OK.

But, as Guérot argues in this piece for Open Democracy, Germany’s export strength is not very handy for the rest of the Eurozone, and even as Germany’s own situation improves, the vocabulary used towards the rest of the EU remains much harsher than it used to be.

Continue reading

Email This Post Print This Post

Europa ist führungslos cries Helmut Schmidt. He’s right. But why?

It seems it’s the season for high level German politicians of yesteryear to have a go at the EU. Former Bundeskanzler Schmidt is quoted by Euractiv.de (Google translation here) as saying:

Es ist im Augenblick keine Führungsperson da. Das ist eine schlimmere Situation, als wir sie jemals in 60 Jahren der europäischen Integration erlebt haben.

The gist is that at the moment there is no leading person there (in the EU), and that it’s a worse situation that we have seen in 60 years of European integration. Schmidt also goes on to have a rant at the whole enlargement of the EU.

Continue reading

Email This Post Print This Post

Berliner Mauer: no fanfare

Mauer - CC / Flickr

Mauer - CC / Flickr

No fanfare on this blog about today’s 20 year commemoration of the fall of the Berlin Wall. Not because I’m not super happy to commemorate such an event, but because understanding the division of Berlin, the division of Germany, and the division of Germany has been a fascinating, personal journey for me since living in Berlin as a raw 21 year old a few years back.

So here are three small things to do to remember how significant 9th November 1989 was:

  1. When you’re in Berlin go to Stiftung Berliner Mauer on Bernauer Straße (S Nordbahnhof or U Bernauer Straße). It gives a good view of how the wall actually looked, and it’s all done in a calm and sobre manner.
  2. Read Stasiland by Anna Funder, a brilliant book that tells stories from behind the wall. It does not try to give complete picture but contains many fantastic, personal stories. It’s a quick read and it’s well written.
  3. If you understand German have a watch of the Youtube video below, made by Deutsche Welle – “Eingemauert” – an excellent animation explaining how the wall worked.

Atheists’ right to advertise

Gott am Bahnhof, Köln - J. Worth

Gott am Bahnhof, Köln - J. Worth

One of the arguments that my German friends like to make against the Atheist Bus Campaign (and especially it’s German equivalent) is that ‘because there is no religious advertising on public transport in Germany atheists do not need to advertise’. This is the sort of reasoning why companies such as EVAG Essen declined the advertising.

So then what do I see when changing trains today at Köln Hbf? The pictured religious advertising right in the middle of the station! So much for there not being religious advertising that atheists are wholly within their rights to counter.

Germans also need to reflect a little about their vocabulary when it comes to atheists. I was introduced to someone (admittedly born and brought up in Baden-Württemberg) on Thursday who’s reaction to me – essentially a complete stranger – when someone said I was behind the atheist bus campaign was “das ist total schwachsinn” (“that is total bullshit”). Think about that for a moment. Am I going to go “that’s bullshit” to someone who I meet who is on the way to church? No I’m not, and it’s not socially acceptable to do so.

It’s time for Germany to learn some lessons on transparency

Germany Map - CC / Flickr

Germany Map - CC / Flickr

What’s up with Germany? What do they have to hide?

I attended a press conference organised by farmsubsidy.org yesterday entitled “Who wants to be a farm subsidy millionaire?” where Jack Thurston, Brigitte Alfter and others presented the latest data on CAP payments using the latest statistics on agriculture spending due to released at the end of April by the Member States… only no data for Germany has been released. This is explained by the German agriculture minister Ilse Aigner in a press release here. The supposed reason? That the European Commission’s requirement to publish the data is against German laws on privacy. But Germany actually agreed to the openness regulation in the first place and, let us not forget, this is public money from EU funds – surely it’s a matter of principle that citizens can trace where the money has gone? I wonder whether Aigner’s background in the CSU representing an area of rural Bavaria has anything to do with it? Stern has more general background on agriculture subsidies here.

This builds on a patchy commitment to transparency among German MEPs in the European Parliament. According to a post subsequently removed from Europa-Transparent (Google cache here), and also covered by the Frankfurter Allgemeine here, Silvana Koch-Mehrin has been grumbling about parlorama.eu, a website that publishes statistics from the European Parliament about attendance records of MEPs. As I write the Parlorama site is closed – again – because someone I presume is threatening them. Koch-Mehrin complains that the site does not take into account the time she took away from the EP on maternity leave, but even with that in her attendance was not exemplary – so citizens should know. And Koch-Mehrin should rather have run a campaign on maternity leave for MEPs (i.e. temporary replacement MEPs from election lists – currently not possible) – Åsa Westlund and Eluned Morgan would be allies in that.

I also seem to recall that it was German MEPs – of all parties – that were most against the publication of the European Parliament’s internal report on MEPs’ expenses, the report that Chris Davies caused controversy by leaking. Then there is the infamous RTL film about MEPs milking the signing in system, with German Green MEP Hiltrud Breyer running into a wall in order to escape the cameras.

With support for the EU not at the levels it once was in Germany, and with brewing discontent with the national political process as a result of the grand coalition, Germany has to be a bit careful. It’s not as easy as it once was to just assume that people will think the best of their politicians.

Email This Post Print This Post

Berlin Hohenschönhausen Prison

I lived in Berlin for 6 months in late 2001 / early 2002; since then I feel I have been playing catch up, trying to understand a city that I was too young to fully appreciate when I lived there. Perhaps I should rephrase: I reasons I enjoyed my time in Berlin back 8 years ago are very much the same as the reasons I love to return to the city – it’s liberal, relaxed, organised, creative, fun, there are plenty of public spaces. But then I was not as conscious of all the history that was around me, I just enjoyed it at face value.

Reading Stasiland by Anna Funder and, to a lesser extent, watching Das Leben der Anderen, has made me reflect a bit more about the history of Berlin and there’s one place mentioned in Stasiland – the Hohenschönhausen Stasi prison – that I have been planning to visit for ages. A couple of days ago, on a sunny Saturday afternoon, I took the tram to the north east suburbs of Berlin and took one of the tours. As well as the photos below you can see more images of the prison on Flickr.

uboot-corridor

Tours of the prison are conducted by former prisoners. Our tour guide was a West German who had initially been imprisoned in Sofia, Bulgaria, trying to help someone escape to Yugoslavia. He was subsequently transferred to Hohenschönhausen for a month, before back to Bulgaria and after 2 years total imprisonment was sent back to West Germany. He was able to show us the very room where he had been interrogated in 1975 and had many stories of the mental pressures applied in the Hohenschönhausen prison. Physical torture was eliminated in the early 1950s; mental pressure was subsequently the option of choice.

The buildings are themselves not as scary as I would have imagined. The underground ‘U-Boot’ cells used in the 1950s are grim, airless and basic. In those cells some of the water torture equipment has been reconstructed. The rest of the buildings, dating from the 1950s, feature cells with some natural light through glass bricks and basic wooden beds and sinks. The long corridors and interrogation rooms are predominately 1970s brown lino with brown wallpaper. Corridors have a lighting system to make sure that prisoners would never meet each other between cells; outdoor ‘tiger cages’ were the place for exercise.

There was also considerable emphasis placed on confusing new arrivals. Prisoners were often transported for hours in the van pictured below to make sure they were disorientated before their arrival in the prison.

I can’t begin to describe all of the stories told during the tour, or even come to terms with my own feelings about the museum in a short blog entry. It’s just clear that hiostory very much lives in Berlin still, not least because so many ex-Stasi still live in the neat streets surrounding the prison. If you want to better understand the meaning of 1989, the meaning of freedom and democracy, then visit the prison the next time you’re in Berlin.

lino

prisoner-transport

water-torture

Email This Post Print This Post