<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: See no citizens, hear no citizens, speak to no citizens &#8211; the institutional approach to the European citizens&#8217; initiative (ECI)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonworth.eu/see-no-citizens-hear-no-citizens-speak-to-no-citizens-the-institutional-approach-to-the-european-citizens-initiative-eci/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonworth.eu/see-no-citizens-hear-no-citizens-speak-to-no-citizens-the-institutional-approach-to-the-european-citizens-initiative-eci/</link>
	<description>At the intersection of the EU, UK politics and tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:21:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eurogoblin</title>
		<link>http://www.jonworth.eu/see-no-citizens-hear-no-citizens-speak-to-no-citizens-the-institutional-approach-to-the-european-citizens-initiative-eci/comment-page-1/#comment-127978</link>
		<dc:creator>Eurogoblin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 11:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonworth.eu/?p=3510#comment-127978</guid>
		<description>I wonder if even a single ECI will manage to collect all the signatures and pass the criteria at this rate. Why all this red tape around something which isn&#039;t even legally binding for the Commission? The whole idea risks being a massive embarrassment and could turn people off the EU even more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if even a single ECI will manage to collect all the signatures and pass the criteria at this rate. Why all this red tape around something which isn&#8217;t even legally binding for the Commission? The whole idea risks being a massive embarrassment and could turn people off the EU even more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBoilingFrog</title>
		<link>http://www.jonworth.eu/see-no-citizens-hear-no-citizens-speak-to-no-citizens-the-institutional-approach-to-the-european-citizens-initiative-eci/comment-page-1/#comment-127906</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBoilingFrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonworth.eu/?p=3510#comment-127906</guid>
		<description>Blimey, the EU are not democratic shock!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blimey, the EU are not democratic shock!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.jonworth.eu/see-no-citizens-hear-no-citizens-speak-to-no-citizens-the-institutional-approach-to-the-european-citizens-initiative-eci/comment-page-1/#comment-127889</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonworth.eu/?p=3510#comment-127889</guid>
		<description>@Brusselsblogger - but isn&#039;t the EU&#039;s solution &lt;em&gt;always&lt;/em&gt; to appoint a bunch of old men to advise on things? Plus it will slow everything down further...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brusselsblogger &#8211; but isn&#8217;t the EU&#8217;s solution <em>always</em> to appoint a bunch of old men to advise on things? Plus it will slow everything down further&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brusselsblogger</title>
		<link>http://www.jonworth.eu/see-no-citizens-hear-no-citizens-speak-to-no-citizens-the-institutional-approach-to-the-european-citizens-initiative-eci/comment-page-1/#comment-127885</link>
		<dc:creator>Brusselsblogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonworth.eu/?p=3510#comment-127885</guid>
		<description>Point 11 is probably not that bad but the other points are indeed far from acceptable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point 11 is probably not that bad but the other points are indeed far from acceptable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

