<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nomination of the Commission: left backs the right, and wonders why it has no message</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonworth.eu/nomination-of-the-commission-left-backs-the-right-and-wonders-why-it-has-no-message/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonworth.eu/nomination-of-the-commission-left-backs-the-right-and-wonders-why-it-has-no-message/</link>
	<description>At the intersection of the EU, UK politics and tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:21:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nils Woerner</title>
		<link>http://www.jonworth.eu/nomination-of-the-commission-left-backs-the-right-and-wonders-why-it-has-no-message/comment-page-1/#comment-124607</link>
		<dc:creator>Nils Woerner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonworth.eu/?p=2710#comment-124607</guid>
		<description>Your frustration with a process that should be political but ends up tactical is understandable. But I believe that your conclusion that it is the failure of leadership and consistency is not hitting the cause of the problem. 

It is perfectly normal that people and politicians act according to their individual advantage. This is popular knowledge in political science since Machiavelli in the 15th century. Hoping for the heads of state to put the well-being of ideals before the well-being of their particular interest is a noble wish but unlikely. Waiting for it is indeed a hopeless thing.

It is not the socialists as a movement that fail in this case. It is the decision making process that leads to such an outcome. The whole procedure how the Commission President is chosen is &quot;festered&quot; and the symptoms that you complain about are a demonstration of it. It has nothing to do with political families as such. The liberals and greens have the same problems. And the conservatives would have the same problems if they were not in the majority. 

In my eyes it&#039;s the process that needs to be changed. Hoping that the European parties (that are helpless in the face of governments decisions) change  their approach means hoping that Machiavelli&#039;s observations can be overcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your frustration with a process that should be political but ends up tactical is understandable. But I believe that your conclusion that it is the failure of leadership and consistency is not hitting the cause of the problem. </p>
<p>It is perfectly normal that people and politicians act according to their individual advantage. This is popular knowledge in political science since Machiavelli in the 15th century. Hoping for the heads of state to put the well-being of ideals before the well-being of their particular interest is a noble wish but unlikely. Waiting for it is indeed a hopeless thing.</p>
<p>It is not the socialists as a movement that fail in this case. It is the decision making process that leads to such an outcome. The whole procedure how the Commission President is chosen is &#8220;festered&#8221; and the symptoms that you complain about are a demonstration of it. It has nothing to do with political families as such. The liberals and greens have the same problems. And the conservatives would have the same problems if they were not in the majority. </p>
<p>In my eyes it&#8217;s the process that needs to be changed. Hoping that the European parties (that are helpless in the face of governments decisions) change  their approach means hoping that Machiavelli&#8217;s observations can be overcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Europapolitik.at</title>
		<link>http://www.jonworth.eu/nomination-of-the-commission-left-backs-the-right-and-wonders-why-it-has-no-message/comment-page-1/#comment-124594</link>
		<dc:creator>Europapolitik.at</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 23:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonworth.eu/?p=2710#comment-124594</guid>
		<description>We added your article on our EU news website for Austria.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We added your article on our EU news website for Austria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brusselsblogger</title>
		<link>http://www.jonworth.eu/nomination-of-the-commission-left-backs-the-right-and-wonders-why-it-has-no-message/comment-page-1/#comment-124593</link>
		<dc:creator>Brusselsblogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 22:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonworth.eu/?p=2710#comment-124593</guid>
		<description>I am not sure that Faymann really wants to &quot;send away an opponent&quot; - I think it&#039;s far more simple: he has promised his coalition partner that they will get the post of EU Commissioner. And he wants to keep that promise.

When the deal was made some people have speculated that the it was all about the following: the SPÖ will get the post of director-general of ORF (Austrian Broadcasting Corporation, which is - as public broadcaster - by far the most influential media of the country) and the ÖVP can get the post of EU Commissioner (who is not important at all for winning elections in Austria).

More in an interview &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bka.gv.at/site/cob__33973/currentpage__0/6589/default.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; (last paragraph) and a press release &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ots.at/presseaussendung/OTS_20090308_OTS0013&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure that Faymann really wants to &#8220;send away an opponent&#8221; &#8211; I think it&#8217;s far more simple: he has promised his coalition partner that they will get the post of EU Commissioner. And he wants to keep that promise.</p>
<p>When the deal was made some people have speculated that the it was all about the following: the SPÖ will get the post of director-general of ORF (Austrian Broadcasting Corporation, which is &#8211; as public broadcaster &#8211; by far the most influential media of the country) and the ÖVP can get the post of EU Commissioner (who is not important at all for winning elections in Austria).</p>
<p>More in an interview <a href="http://www.bka.gv.at/site/cob__33973/currentpage__0/6589/default.aspx" rel="nofollow">here</a> (last paragraph) and a press release <a href="http://www.ots.at/presseaussendung/OTS_20090308_OTS0013" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

