<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: German election gender politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonworth.eu/german-election-gender-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonworth.eu/german-election-gender-politics/</link>
	<description>At the intersection of the EU, UK politics and tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:28:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://www.jonworth.eu/german-election-gender-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-124414</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonworth.eu/?p=2592#comment-124414</guid>
		<description>This was on Women&#039;s hour earlier today, sort of.
Don&#039;t get me wrong - I wish politics could be about actually finding out what works best  and ideas, but we&#039;re not there yet.
I think that when the media no longer uses a woman&#039;s gender as a reason to detract from policies she espouses, and actually listens to what she says rather than taking the worst possible interpretation (loads of examples out there but I was cross about http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article327889.ece and http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1204657/My-womanifesto-With-Gordon-holiday-Harriet-Harman-launched-anti-male-blitzkrieg--really-like-PM.html), then I think that&#039;s the time at which it becomes unforgivable for a female politician to also play on her gender..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was on Women&#8217;s hour earlier today, sort of.<br />
Don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8211; I wish politics could be about actually finding out what works best  and ideas, but we&#8217;re not there yet.<br />
I think that when the media no longer uses a woman&#8217;s gender as a reason to detract from policies she espouses, and actually listens to what she says rather than taking the worst possible interpretation (loads of examples out there but I was cross about <a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article327889.ece" rel="nofollow">http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article327889.ece</a> and <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1204657/My-womanifesto-With-Gordon-holiday-Harriet-Harman-launched-anti-male-blitzkrieg--really-like-PM.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1204657/My-womanifesto-With-Gordon-holiday-Harriet-Harman-launched-anti-male-blitzkrieg&#8211;really-like-PM.html</a>), then I think that&#8217;s the time at which it becomes unforgivable for a female politician to also play on her gender..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.jonworth.eu/german-election-gender-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-124352</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonworth.eu/?p=2592#comment-124352</guid>
		<description>Diese Werbung ist total vorschbar!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diese Werbung ist total vorschbar!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.jonworth.eu/german-election-gender-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-124330</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonworth.eu/?p=2592#comment-124330</guid>
		<description>Yes, perhaps I was wrong to bring in handbag wars - there was a serious point in there.

von Klaeden - it is a bit scary. Just one of those times that the Photoshop worked out very effectively! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, perhaps I was wrong to bring in handbag wars &#8211; there was a serious point in there.</p>
<p>von Klaeden &#8211; it is a bit scary. Just one of those times that the Photoshop worked out very effectively! <img src='http://www.jonworth.eu/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Gardner</title>
		<link>http://www.jonworth.eu/german-election-gender-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-124329</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonworth.eu/?p=2592#comment-124329</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Jon - Caroline Flint&#039;s &quot;window-dressing&quot; whinge was totally undermined by her own readiness to sit in the window. 

But I think you&#039;re wrong to bring the &quot;handbag wars&quot; into it. It was silly that that descended into questions about how much the politicians spent on their own bags, yes. But Harman&#039;s point was a very good one: she was simply trying to draw attention to the problem of inequality as manifested in conspicuous consumption, and to hang her point on a clear image. The fact that she used handbags I think shows no more than that she wants women to exist in our political imagination rather than to be invisible. I suspect she may feel our political thinking and language is all very male. I don&#039;t like blaming &quot;the media&quot; but in this case I think it was journalists rather than politicians who tried to turn it into a &quot;cat-fight&quot; story. 

Your version of von Klaeden is weirdly convincing. Is it his mum?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Jon &#8211; Caroline Flint&#8217;s &#8220;window-dressing&#8221; whinge was totally undermined by her own readiness to sit in the window. </p>
<p>But I think you&#8217;re wrong to bring the &#8220;handbag wars&#8221; into it. It was silly that that descended into questions about how much the politicians spent on their own bags, yes. But Harman&#8217;s point was a very good one: she was simply trying to draw attention to the problem of inequality as manifested in conspicuous consumption, and to hang her point on a clear image. The fact that she used handbags I think shows no more than that she wants women to exist in our political imagination rather than to be invisible. I suspect she may feel our political thinking and language is all very male. I don&#8217;t like blaming &#8220;the media&#8221; but in this case I think it was journalists rather than politicians who tried to turn it into a &#8220;cat-fight&#8221; story. </p>
<p>Your version of von Klaeden is weirdly convincing. Is it his mum?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

