Labour MEP Glyn Ford submitted a written question to the European Commission, asking how the €162,387,985 EU Solidarity Fund (EUSF) money should be spent. I’ve twice posted about this matter before, when it looked like the Treasury would try to keep 2/3 of the money for its own uses to make up for reductions in the UK rebate. The response from Danuta Hübner, Regional Affairs Commissioner, states: “Any amounts not spent or spent for ineligible operations will be recovered by the Commission”. So the Commission will demand the cash back if it’s not used for flood aid. Now over to the MEPs in the areas that were flooded to make sure that happens!
Jon Worth. European, social democrat, federalist, feminist, atheist, anti-monarchist, ENTJ. Inline skater. Blogger, website designer, avid Mac user, trainer.
Jon's Twitter Updates
Around this time of year I've previously blogged...
- 2009
- Atheist Bus - why did it work?
Here are some slides I have put together explaining why the atheist bus campaign worked. Feel free
- Atheist Bus - why did it work?
- 2008
- Paul Stinchcombe and the McCanns - two sides of the British media
My visits to London give me a short, sharp dose of news in the UK - and what a dose over the last
- Paul Stinchcombe and the McCanns - two sides of the British media
- 2007
- Skiing in Ã…re, hence little blogging
I'm away from everything for a week, skiing in Åre in Jämtland in norther Sweden. It's the
- Skiing in Ã…re, hence little blogging
- 2006
- Polly Toynbee on Sweden again
Polly Toynbee is on about Sweden again in her column in The Guardian today - read it here. The
- Polly Toynbee on Sweden again
Categories: Euroblog
- Belgian Life (RSS)
- EU Politics (RSS)
- Euroblog (RSS)
- Technology (RSS)
- Travel (RSS)
- UK Life (RSS)
- UK Politics (RSS)
Tags
2010 General Election Anyone But Barroso Atheism Atheist Bus Atheist Bus Campaign Blogging Brussels Czech Presidency David Cameron David Miliband EU Budget European Commission European Parliament European Parliament Elections Eurostar Facebook Gaffe-o-Meter Gordon Brown Jose Manuel Barroso Labour Margot Wallström Martin Schulz Open Europe Poul Nyrup Rasmussen President of the European Council Rocco Buttiglione Social Media Tony Blair Treaty of Lisbon TwitterLinks: Mostly EU
- Alejandro Ribo
- Bente Kalsnes
- Berlaymonster
- Bit More Complicated
- Blogactiv
- Blogging Portal
- CAP Health Check
- Coulisses de Bruxelles (FR)
- England Expects
- EUObserver Blogs
- European Federalists
- Eurosocialist
- Federal Union Blog
- Follow the Money
- FT Brussels Blog
- Grahnlaw
- Gulf Stream Blues
- Head of Legal
- Jason O’Mahony
- Joan Marc Simon
- Julien Frisch
- Kosmopolito
- Le Taurillon
- Margot Wallström
- Martin Teubner
- Martin Westlake
- Mary Honeyball MEP
- New Europe
- Nosemonkey / Eutopia
- Public Affairs 2.0
- Richard Corbett
- Social Europe
- Talking about the EU
Links: Mostly UK
- Bloggers4Labour
- Charlie Beckett
- Confessions of a Political Animal
- Iain Dale
- Labour List
- Liberal Conspiracy
- Lord Toby Harris
- Luke Akehurst
- Mark Pack
- Miranda Grell
- Never Trust A Hippy
- Next Left
- Ordovicius
- Paul Flynn MP
- Paul Waugh
- Political Betting
- ProIssues
- Republic Blog
- Rupa Huq
- Simon Dickson
- Tom Harris












Good – but please stop claiming that “The Treasury” is trying to pocket £79 million. The EU will pocket the £79 million by taking it out of our rebate.
The Government should spend £110 million in the flood hit areas, they need it. But the EU is only giving us £31 million pounds, not £110 million.
To spend the full £110 million, the Government will need to tax, borrow, or disinvest from elsewhere, the sum of £79 million.
Yes, yeah, bla, it’s our money, bla, bla…
Give the EU tax raising powers, democratically controlled by the European Parliament. That’s the way to end this pettiness.
The EU has tax raising powers. Import duties are set by it and flow to it. Which of course is why we’ll not have free trade while this iniquitous system persists.
Not that kind of tax raising powers… Plus customs duties and agricultural levies are less than 15% of the total EU budget, and have been declining in real terms for decades.
Jon, two fairly separate issues.
One, it is our money, all of it, we pay in more than we get out, sure – that’s a general EU-sceptic point. I think it’s a fair thing to point out in a propaganda sense, but I think it’s different from the point being raised here.
Two, this specific issue. Say for example the EU was giving the UK £650million of our own money back this year, and we were spending £400m of it on x, and £250m of it on y.
Now, because of the floods, it is giving us £681m. If we spend £110m on flood-hit areas, we have £571m of “EU money” left over to pay for projects x and y, do we not? If the EU really wants to give us £110 million for flood-hit areas, it needs to up our annual funding from £650 million to £760 million, does it not?
Because I don’t know about you, but if someone told me they were going to give me eleven pounds, and at the end of the process I found I only had three pounds more than I had expected, and then they told me I had to give the eleven pounds to someone else, I’d feel like I’d been diddled out of eight pounds.
I’m happy to give the EU extra tax-raising powers, by the way. I don’t think the British Government should get the blame for that portion of tax – it certainly doesn’t get the credit for the spending, since displaying the flag and the “funded by the EU” is compulsory for EU-funded projects.
Let us just get out of the new EUSSR and we will not
have to have all this ball-aching tosh about who gives what to whom !
Jon,
I’ll make the tediously obvious point that were we not paying in some billions, nett, our government could actually afford to sort out the flood defenses and compensation without EU hand-outs.*
DK
* This doesn’t mean that they would. However, the department responsible for flood defenses, Defra, has been (a) extremely unwise with its spending, and (b) underspending on flood defences for years (see Private Eye passim).
They are also facing an additional £350 – £400 million + EU fine for not disbursing the CAP payments properly.
Therefore, whilst the EU is handing over £31 million to help with the flood damage with one hand, it is taking away ten times that from the department responsible with the other.
Now, you might point out that Defra should have sorted out the CAP payments and that their incompetence has led to their fine, and I would agree with you.
But I, of course, would hold it up as an example of the incompetence of government in general and use it to campaign for less state interference.
DK – some valid points… But in the wider scale of the UK government’s budget the contribution to the EU is very small. The UK net contribution, after the rebate, is around 2.5 billion pounds a year, and DWP’s annual budget is 105 billion pounds…